Difference between revisions of "Table:Character standards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- do not remove this. --> {{conference table thread}} <!-- Please always sign your comments with four tildes --> == Discussion == In updating and cleaning character articl...") |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
In updating and cleaning character articles, I have found a lot of differences. Should we consider creating a [[Infosphere:Standard of character articles]] page? [[User:Aki|Aki]] 12:43, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | In updating and cleaning character articles, I have found a lot of differences. Should we consider creating a [[Infosphere:Standard of character articles]] page? [[User:Aki|Aki]] 12:43, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | ||
:Standardization is nice. But what did you have in mind? [[User:Teyrn of Highever|Teyrn of Highever]] 12:50, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
::Pretty much create a standard page based on what users agree is the optimal version of a character's article. I wouldn't mind creating a standard page, and then let it open for discussion of change. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 13:00, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::While not necessarily optimal, there is [[Template:CharacterArticleTemplate|this]]. Hopefully, the main reason for non-standard articles on characters is that more is known about certain aspects of certain characters. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 13:18, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::Quolnok pretty much said everything I was going to say. Can you give examples of the differences you've found, Aki? That might help improve the templates that are already existing. [[User:Teyrn of Highever|Teyrn of Highever]] 13:20, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
::::Ah, yes, I didn't find that one. However, I do think that one isn't as ultimate as it could be, and I would like to put in more examples, like how it should include sub-sections, what should go into what section (eg what is trivia and what is biography?), and such. | |||
::::Differences that I've found include the order of the sections (personality above biography for example) and how much is included in the introduction. Many articles have a lengthy introduction and no biography section, for example. | |||
::::If you want to, I can start writing an [[User:Aki/Template:CharacterArticleTemplate|alternative]] (more expanded) version of [[Template:CharacterArticleTemplate|aforementioned template]], and link to it here asking if it should replace the current one. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 13:35, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::::The template could use some work. But if the issue is just a matter of length and order of sections, I don't think changes are critical. [[User:Teyrn of Highever|Teyrn of Highever]] 13:44, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
::::::I don't think the changes are critical either, but I think they'd be good to have. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 13:55, 23 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::::I'm in favour of the alternative version. How do you feel about the name ''[[Template:Character infobox|Template:Character article]]'', Aki? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 00:48, 24 May 2011 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 00:48, 24 May 2011
Discussion
In updating and cleaning character articles, I have found a lot of differences. Should we consider creating a Infosphere:Standard of character articles page? Aki 12:43, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- Standardization is nice. But what did you have in mind? Teyrn of Highever 12:50, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- Pretty much create a standard page based on what users agree is the optimal version of a character's article. I wouldn't mind creating a standard page, and then let it open for discussion of change. Aki 13:00, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- While not necessarily optimal, there is this. Hopefully, the main reason for non-standard articles on characters is that more is known about certain aspects of certain characters. - Quolnok 13:18, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- Quolnok pretty much said everything I was going to say. Can you give examples of the differences you've found, Aki? That might help improve the templates that are already existing. Teyrn of Highever 13:20, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- Ah, yes, I didn't find that one. However, I do think that one isn't as ultimate as it could be, and I would like to put in more examples, like how it should include sub-sections, what should go into what section (eg what is trivia and what is biography?), and such.
- Differences that I've found include the order of the sections (personality above biography for example) and how much is included in the introduction. Many articles have a lengthy introduction and no biography section, for example.
- If you want to, I can start writing an alternative (more expanded) version of aforementioned template, and link to it here asking if it should replace the current one. Aki 13:35, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- The template could use some work. But if the issue is just a matter of length and order of sections, I don't think changes are critical. Teyrn of Highever 13:44, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- I don't think the changes are critical either, but I think they'd be good to have. Aki 13:55, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- I'm in favour of the alternative version. How do you feel about the name Template:Character article, Aki? Sanfazer 00:48, 24 May 2011 (CEST)
- The template could use some work. But if the issue is just a matter of length and order of sections, I don't think changes are critical. Teyrn of Highever 13:44, 23 May 2011 (CEST)
- Pretty much create a standard page based on what users agree is the optimal version of a character's article. I wouldn't mind creating a standard page, and then let it open for discussion of change. Aki 13:00, 23 May 2011 (CEST)